Antibacterial activity of Momordica charantia (Curcubitaceae) extracts and fractions
- *Corresponding Author:
- José Galberto M. Costa
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Bioprospecção Molecular, Departamento de Química Biológica, Laboratório de Pesquisa de Produtos Naturais, Universidade Regional do Cariri, Rua Cel. Antônio Luiz 1161, Pimenta, 63105-000 Crato-CE, Brasil
E-mail: [email protected]
Date of Received :28-03-2010
Date of Modified :16-06-2010
Date of Accepted :20-12-2010
Available Online :15-02-2011
Momordica charantia L. belongs to the family Curcubitaceae and it is very common in many Brazilian regions. The plant is a liana with flowers and yellow fruits that present red seeds when are ripe. Popularly known as “melão-de-são-caetano”, “melão amargo” or “cabaço-amargo”, it possesses many uses: antidiabetic, antihelmintic, antmicrobial, anticancerigenous and antioxidant. The phytochemical prospection of the fresh and dried leaves extracts showed the presence of different classes of secondary metabolites, as flavonoids, alkaloids and tannins, that have dem-onstrated antimicrobial action. Fresh and dried leaves presented significantly anti-microbial activity against all bacterial strains tested, specially Escherichia coli. Ethyl acetate fractions were effective against Escherichia coli and Bacillus cereus. The mod-ulatory activity was significative too.
Momordica charantia, Bioprospection, antibacterial activity
IBAMA: Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Naturais Renováveis EtOH: Ethanol NCCLS: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards ATCC: American Type Culture Collection CFU: Colony Forming Unit BHI: Brain Heart Infusion DMSO: dimethylsulfoxide MIC: Minimum inhibitory concentration FLE: fresch leaves extract; FLE HEX: fraction hexane of the fresch leaves extract; FLE CLO: fraction chloroform of the fresch leaves extract; FLE ACET: fraction ethyl acetate of the fresch leaves extract; FLE MET: fraction methanol of the fresch leaves extract; DLE: dried leaves extract; DLE HEX: fraction hexane of the dried leaves extract; DLE CLO: fraction chloroform of the dried leaves extract; DLE ACET: fraction ethyl acetate of the dried leaves extract; DLE MET: fraction methanol of the dried leaves extract. (AMIC) Amikacin; (KAN) Kanamycin; (GEN) Gentamicin; (NEO) Neomicin; (C+) Positive control;
The Curcubitaceae family is composed by 90 genera and about 700 species, mainly in tropical regions (Asia, Amazonia, Oriental Africa and Caribe), and subtropical. The species can be found in temperate regions too. Many species are cultivated because their comestible properties, as pumpkin (Cucurbita sp), melon (Cucumis melo L.), cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) and West Indian gherkin (Cucumis anguria L.) [1,2]. The “melão-desão- caetano” (Momordica charantia L.), also belongs to this family, is very common in many Brazilian regions. This specie is a liana with flowers and yellow fruits that present red seeds when are ripe . Popularly known as “melão-de-são-caetano”, “melão amargo” or “cabaço-amargo”, it possesses many uses, as antidiabetic, carminative, antihelmintic, antimalaral and antimicrobial, antiviral, anticancerigenous, contraceptive, immunostimulant and laxative, antioxidant and insecticidal, besides its indication in skin treatments (eczema, acne, mycoses, scabies, hemorrhoid and furuncules [4-6].
According to Omoregbe et al. (1996)  aqueous, ethanolic and methanolic extracts of M. charantia leaves presented antimicrobial activity against Escherichia coli, Salmonella paratyphi, Shigella dysenterae, Streptomyces griseus and Mycobacterium tuberculosis. On the other hand Prabakar and Jebanesan (2004) have shown that the leaves methanolic extracts were effective against Culex quinquefasciatus larvae .
Recently, the antiviral and antihelmintic activities of glycosidic triterpenoids mormodicine I and II were demonstrated, with special regard to nematicidal properties of these substances .
As reported by Ritter et al (2002) , “melãode- são-caetano” can´t be used internally, because the known toxicity of its seeds that led to an inhibition of pregnancy in mice [11-13], besides the fact that its popular use is not the same that ones recommended by literature.
The purpose of this work was to perform the chemical prospection of the fresh and dry leaves extracts and to evaluate the antibacterial activity of M. charantia extracts and fractions.
Materials And Methods
Ethanolic extract obtention
Leaves of M. charantia were collected on July 2009 at Instituto Chico Mendes/IBAMA, Crato, Ceará, Brazil. A voucher specimen is deposited at the herbarium Prisco Bezerra (Federal University of Ceará; accession number # 44172).
The fresh leaves extract was obtained by extraction with cold EtOH (TRDinamica), for 72 h at room temperature and after this the distillated solvent was rotaevaporated (yield 3.92%).
In order to obtain the dried leaves extract, leaves were dried for 48h at 40±2°C, picked and immersed in EtOH for 72h. After this, the solvent distillation was performed (yield 11.75%).
The fresh leaves extract was submitted to filtration using a Büchner funnel and four solvents: hexane, chloroform, ethyl acetate and methanol (TRDinamica) leading the obtention of four fractions. The dried leaves extract was submitted to the same procedure, using the same solvents and obtaining four fractions.
The fresh and dried leaves extract, and the respective fractions were submitted to phytochemical tests in order to detect the presence of heterosides, saponnins, tannins, flavonoids, steroids, triterpens, cumarines, quinones, organic acids and alkaloids were performed following the method described by Matos (1997) . These tests are based on visual observation of color modification or precipitate formation after addition of specific reagents
Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Determination
The antibacterial activity was investigated by employing a microdilution method, recommended by NCCLS M7-A6. Previously to the tests, bacterial strains were activated in Brain Hear Infusion Broth (BHI, Difco) for 24h at 35 ± 2ºC. Two grampositive standard strains were used: Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 12692) and Bacillus cereus (ATCC 33018); three strains obtained from clinical material: Staphylococcus aureus (358), Escherichia coli (10536) and Escherichia coli (27). The inoculum was an overnight culture of each bacterial species in BHI broth diluted in the same media to a final concentration of approximately 1 x 108 UFC/mL (0.5 nephelometric turbidity units - McFarland scale). After this, the suspension was diluted to 1 x 106 UFC/mL in 10% BHI. 100 μL of each dilution were distributed in 96-well plates plus extracts and fractions in different concentrations, achieving 5 x 105 UFC/mL as final concentration of the inoculums [15-17].
Extracts and fractions were dissolved in distilled water and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, Merck) to concentration of 1024 μg/mL. Further serial dilutions were performed to reach a final concentration in the range of 512 to 8 μg/mL. All experiments were performed in triplicate and the microdilution trays were incubated at 35 ± 2ºC for 24 h. Antibacterial activity was detected using a colorimetric method by adding 25 μL of resazurin staining (0.01%) aqueous solution in each well at the end of the incubation period. The minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) was defined as the lowest extract or fraction concentration able to inhibit the bacteria growth, as indicated by resazurin staining (bacteria died cells are not able to change the staining color by visual observation – blue to red) . The negative control was BHI.
Modulatory Activity Determination
In order to evaluate the extracts and fractions as modulators of antibiotic resistance, the MICs of aminoglycosides (neomycin, kanamycin, amikacin and gentamicin (Sigma Chemical Co.) against the analyzed strains were determined in the presence or absence of extracts and fractions using the microdilution test. Subinhibitory concentrations (MIC 1/8) in 10% BHI were used [19, 20].
Results And Discussion
The chemical prospection of M. charantia fresh leaves extracts and fractions have indicated the presence of various secondary metabolites classes (Table 1), that are known to present different therapeutic applications, for example, tannins (antimicrobial, antiviral, moluscicidal and antitumoral), flavonoids (anticarcinogenic, antiviral, antihemorrhagic and antioxidant) [21-25]. The dried leaves extract and its fractions revealed the presence of many metabolites (Table 1), some of them were found in fresh leaves extract too.
(+) positive; (-) negative; FLE: fresh leaves extract; FLE HEX: fraction hexane of the fresh leaves extract; FLE CLO: fraction chloroform of the fresh leaves extract; FLE ACET: fraction ethyl acetate of the fresh leaves extract; FLE MET: fraction methanol of the frech leaves extract; DLE: dried leaves extract; DLE HEX: fraction hexane of the dried leaves extract; DLE CLO: fraction chloroform of the dried leaves extract; DLE ACET: fraction ethyl acetate of the dried leaves extract; DLE MET: fraction methanol of the dried leaves extract.
Table 1: Identification of the main chemical classes of the extracts and fractions
Regarding the antibacterial activity (Table 2), fresh leaves extract inhibited the growth of all tested strains. The lowest MIC (32 μg/mL) was against E. coli (27). The chloroform fraction also presented the lowest MIC against the same microorganism (64 μg/mL). The ethyl acetate fraction presented a similar result, showing activity against E. coli (27) and B. cereus (ATCC 33018) at 64μg/mL. The methanol fraction was effective against all tested strains and the lowest MIC (128 μg/mL) was against S. aureus (358). The hexane fraction was ineffective against all tested strains.
|Sample / Obtained concentrations (μg/mL)|
* multiresistant strains; FLE: fresh leaves extract; FLE HEX: fraction hexane of the fresh leaves extract; FLE CLO: fraction chloroform of the fresh leaves extract; FLE ACET: fraction ethyl acetate of the fresh leaves extract; FLE MET: fraction methanol of the fresh leaves extract; DLE: dried leaves extract; DLE HEX: fraction hexane of the dried leaves extract; DLE CLO: fraction chloroform of the dried leaves extract; DLE ACET: fraction ethyl acetate of the dried leaves extract; DLE MET: fraction methanol of the dried leaves extract.
Table 2: Values of the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of fresh and dried leaves extract, and the respective fractions
The dried leaves extract was effective against all tested strains and the lowest MIC (128 μg/mL) was against E. coli (27). The chloroform fraction presented the best results against E. coli (27) and S. aureus (ATCC 12692). The ethyl acetate fraction was effective against all tested strains and, similarly to ethyl acetate fraction, the lowest MICs were against was effective against all tested strains and the lowest MIC (32μg/mL) was against E. coli (27) and B. cereus (ATCC 33018). The methanol fraction had a MIC of 512 μg/mL, indicating activity against (ATCC 12692), E. coli (10536) and E. coli (27). The hexane fraction, as the fresh leaves extract, had no effect against the strains.
The chemical prospection carried out with fresh leaves extract and dried leaves extract showed that many secondary metabolites of various classes occur in both extracts, as tannins, flavonoids and alkaloids. These metabolites are reported to have many biological actions, including antimicrobial .
When the modulatory activity was evaluated, the extracts and fractions presented synergistic effect, with few exceptions, against the aminoglycosides tested. In some cases, no effect was observed (Table 3). In the most cases, a synergistic effect was observed, as shown by fresh leaves plus gentamicin or kanamycin against S. aureus (358). The same effect was observed for methanol fraction plus all aminoglycosides tested against E. coli (27) (Table 4).
|FLE8μg/mL||FLE Acet16 μg/mL||FLE Clo12 μg/mL||FLE MET512 μg/mL||C+|
|FLE32 μg/mL||FLE Acet16μg/mL||FLE Clo512 μg/mL||FLE MET16 μg/mL||C+|
|FLE4 μg/mL||FLE Acet8μg/mL||FLE Clo8μg/mL||FLE MET32 μg/mL||C+|
|FLE>512 μg/mL||FLE Acet8μg/mL||FLE Clo>512 μg/mL||FLE MET>512 μg/mL||C+|
* multiresistant strains (AMIC) Amikacin; (KAN) Kanamycin; (GEN) Gentamicin; (NEO) Neomicin; (C+)Positive control.
Table 3: Fresh leaves extract and fractions antibacterial activity by direct contact
|DLE32μg/mL||DLE Hex >512 μg/mL||DLE Clo8 μg/mL||DLE Met8 μg/mL||C+|
|DLE32 μg/mL||DLE Hex >512 μg/mL||DLE Clo>512 μg/mL||DLE Met16 μg/mL||C+|
|DLE16μg/mL||DLE Hex >512μg/mL||DLE Clo8 μg/mL||DLE Met4 μg/mL||C+|
|DLE>512 μg/mL||DLE Hex >512 μg/mL||DLE Clo16 μg/mL||DLE Met4 μg/mL||C+|
* multiresistant strains (AMIC) Amikacin; (KAN) Kanamycin; (GEN) Gentamicin; (NEO) Neomicin; (C+)Positive control.
Table 4: Dried leaves extract and fractions antibacterial activity by direct contact
In general, the toxic effect to the bacterial membrane and function, because the lipophilic membrane structure, has been used to explain the antimicrobial effect of essential oils and extracts [26, 27].
The results obtained here reveal that M. charantia extracts have presented significative antibacterial activity in vitro and this effect could be associated to the chemical constituents of the extracts and their ability to penetrate into lipidical layers.
Significative results were obtained for both extracts, but the fractions had the lowest MICs against S. aureus (358), E. coli (27) and B. cereus (ATCC 33018). Th is suggests a possible extract antagonistic effect and this activity can be related to the constituents of the extracts and fractions. Th is result shows the relevance of the study of efflux pump inhibition effect of native species extracts as potential antibiotic adjuvant.
The chemical prospection of fresh and dried M. charantia leaves extracts have shown the presence of different secondary metabolites, as steroids, flavonoids, alkaloids and tannins, that have comproved antimicrobial action.
Both extracts, fresh and dried leaves, presented significative antibacterial activity against all tested strains, especially against E. coli (27). Regarding to fractions MICs, the ethyl acetate fraction was the most effective against gram-negative (EC 27) strains from clinical material and standard gram-positive (BC 33018), besides it presented the most significative MIC. The ethyl acetate fraction presented the same behavior, but in a minor concentration.
The assay to determine the MIC has demonstrated the efficiency of the extracts and of some fractions against the standard strains and from clinical material, showing that there is a relationship when the ethyl acetate fraction from both extracts is compared.
The evaluation of the modulatory activity showed a significative result, and this can be related to a major synergic potential of extracts and fractions.
The authors would like to acknowledge financial support from CAPES, CNPq and FUNCAP, and the FIOCRUZ for the bacterial lines.
Conflict of Interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
- Nee M. Flora da reserva Ducke, Amazonas, Brasil: Cucurbitaceae. Rodriguésia. 2007; 58 (3): 703-07.
- Braca A, Siciliano T. Chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of Momordica charantia seed essential oil. Fitoterapia. 2008; 79: 123–5.
- Bonfim SM. Isolamento de metabólitos antifúngicos de Streptomyces sp. UFPEDA. 3347 endófito de Momordica charantia L. (Curcubitaceae). Universidade Federal de Pernambuco. Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências Farmacêuticas: 2008.
- Yesilada E, Sezik E, Honda, G, et al. Traditional medicine in Turkey IX: folk medicine in north-west Anatolia. J Ethnopharmacol. 1999; 64:199- 206.
- Grover JK, Yadav SP. Pharmacological actions and potential uses of Momordica charantia: a review. J Ethnopharmacol. 2004; 93: 123-132.
- Basch E, Gabardi S, Ulbricht, C. Bitter melon (Momordica charantia): a review of efficacy and safety. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2003; 65:356-9.
- Omoregbe RE, Ikuebe OM, Ihimire IG. Antimicrobial activity of some medicinal plants extracts on Escherichia coli, Salmonella paratyphi and Shigella dysenteriae. Afr J Med Med Sci. 1996; 25:373-5.
- Prabakar K, Jebanesan A. Larvicidal efficacy of some Cucurbitacious plant leaf extracts against Culex quinquefasciatus (Say). Biores Technol. 2004; 95:113-4.
- Beloin N. Ethnomedicinal uses of Mormodica charantia (Curcubitaceae) in Togo and relation to its phytochemistry and biological activity. J Ethnopharmacol. 2005; 96: 49-55.
- Ritter MR, Saobierajski GR, Schenkel EP, et al. Plantas utilizadas no município de Ipê, RS, Brasil. Rev Bras Farmacog. 2008; 12: 51-62.
- Chan WY, Tam PP, Yeung HW. The termination of early pregnancy in the mouse by beta-momorcharin. Contraception. 1984; 29 (1): 91-100.
- Mengue SS, Mentz LA, Schenkel EP. Uso de plantas medicinais na gravidez: Manual de teratogênese. Porto Alegre: Editora da Universidade/ UFRGS; 2001.
- Naghetini CC. Caracterização físico-química e atividade antifúngica dos óleos essenciais da cúrcuma. Faculdade de Farmácia da UFMG. Belo Horizonte, MG; 2006.
- Matos FJA. Introdução à Fitoquímica Experimental. 2ª ed. Fortaleza, Edições UFC; 1997.
- Hadacek F, Greger H. Testing of antifungal natural products: methodologies, comparability of results and assay choice. Phytochem Anal. 2000; 11: 137-147.
- National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards – NCCLS. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts. Villanova, NCCLS. 17(9). (Document M7-A6). 2002.
- Viljoen A, Vuuren AV, Ernst E, et al. Osmitopsis astericoides (Asteraceae) - the antimicrobial activity and essential oil composition of a Cape-Dutch remedy. J Ethnopharmacol. 2003; 88 (2-3):137-143.
- Salvat A, Antonnacci L, Fortunato RH, et al. Screening of some plants from North Argentin for their antimicrobial activity. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2001; 32(5): 293-297.
- Coutinho HDM. Resistência bacteriana aos metais pesados. Monografia de Graduação. UFPB. 1996.
- Sagdiç O. Sensitivity of four pathogens pathogenic bactéria to Turkish thyme and Oregano hydrosols. Lebensmittel-Wissenchaft und-Technologie. 2005; 36: 467-473.
- Scalbert, A. Antimicrobial properties of tannins. Phytochemistry. 1991; 30:3875-3883.
- Okuda T, Yoshiba T, Hatano T. Classification of oligomeric hydrolysable tannins and specificity of their occurrence in plants. Phytochemistry. 1993; 32:507-521.
- Marston A, Hostettmann K. Plant Molluscicides. Review. Phytochemistry. 1985; 24:639-2.
- Okuda T, Yoshiba T, Hatano T. Ellagitannins as active constituents of medicinal plants. Planta Medica. 1989; 55:117-122.
- Simões CMO, Schenkel EP, Gosmann G, et al. Farmacognosia: da planta ao medicamento. Porto Alegre/ Florianópolis, 4ª Ed. Universidade/ UFRGS/ Ed. da UFSC, 2002.
- Sikkema J, Bont JAM, Poolman, B. Interactions of cyclic hydrocarbons with biological membranes. J. Biol. Chem, 1994; 269: 8022-28.
- Sikkema J, Bont JA, Poolman, B. Mechanisms of membrane toxicity of hydrocarbons. Microbiol Rev. 1995; 59: 201-222.